Submit your e-mail to receive budget updates and event notifications
![]() |
Sign Up:Submit your e-mail to receive budget updates and event notifications |
New Report: A Fiscal Voter Guide to the 2008 Election
Budget BlogWhat’s on the Table for Obama, Part II30 September 2008 - 3:13pmSeptember 30 - Last week, Slate Magazine reported that the Obama campaign had removed language about the Senator's opposition to raising the Social Security retirement age from his website. Since then, the campaign website has restored the previous language on the retirement age, and eliminated language stating that he would "work with members of Congress from both parties to strengthen Social Security and prevent privatization while protecting middle class families from tax increases or benefit cuts." Currently, the website reads (emphasis added to restored text): "Obama and Biden are committed to ensuring Social Security is solvent and viable for the American people, now and in the future. Obama and Biden will be honest with the American people about the long-term solvency of Social Security and the ways we can address the shortfall. Obama and Biden will protect Social Security benefits for current and future beneficiaries alike. And they do not believe it is necessary or fair to hardworking seniors to raise the retirement age. Obama and Biden are strongly opposed to privatizing Social Security." Candidates Propose Increase in FDIC Insurance Limit30 September 2008 - 2:04pm
September 30 - This morning, after the House failed to
pass a financial bailout plan - and stocks subsequently plunged by record
amounts - both candidates suggested that the FDIC should help reassure Americans
about the security of money placed in bank deposits by raising the insured funds
limit from $100,000 to $250,000. Senator Obama suggested that this measure
"would boost small businesses, make our banking system more secure and help
restore public confidence in our financial system."
"We haven't convinced people that this is a rescue effort, not just for Wall Street but for Main Street America, for working families, for small businesses, the heartland of America - all over America... We didn't do a good enough job." The Candidates' Fiscal Options Fade29 September 2008 - 3:55pmSeptember 29 - An article in the Financial Times today laments that neither presidential candidate was willing to face up to hard fiscal choices, in light of the expected bailout. Warning that the candidates would not be able to afford their tax and spending plans, and that the deficit was projected to sky rocket, the piece argued that: "If one idea caused the subprime meltdown and the subsequent financial emergency, it was the belief that house prices could not fall... A similar complacency now attends discussion of the fiscal outlook... It is assumed that the US can borrow without limit. In fact, the US has a budget constraint... This limit is about to be tested, and if the global capital market decides enough is enough, the challenge confronting the Treasury and the Federal Reserve will make even last week's exertions seem mild...The next administration's fiscal options are vanishing before our eyes. Somebody should tell the candidates - and the country."
Know the Candidates and the Issues
|
Board of Directors
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US Budget Watch is a project of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget at the New America Foundation and is supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts. None of these organizations support or oppose any candidate for office. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget takes no positions on the specific policies discussed on this website and does not believe there are any right or wrong positions. The purpose of this site is to promote understanding of current budgetary issues, not to influence visitors' choice of candidates. |